Man never landed on the moon,
The holocaust never happened,
and now from the King County Prosecutors Office,
Doctor never physically examined a penis.
Expert Prosecutor Mark Larson and Team
Of course what can one expect in King County Prosecutor Judge Lori K. Smith’s courtroom when King County Prosecutors OBJECTED to abuse PREVENTION program that Sound Doctrine Church, (i.e. Timothy Williams) had instituted. “Why would a church so small need such an abuse prevention program” King County Prosecutor Jason Simmons objected.
One can only wonder how the doctor, being a male ever managed to urinate.
If a wise man goes to court with a fool, the fool rages and scoffs, and there is no peace. (Proverbs 29:9)
Down at the King County Courthouse, under the leadership of Dan Satterberg and Team it is clearly pour contempt on the truth and say anything to promote a win. It is common knowledge among lawyers that Prosecutor Dan Satterberg’s Office, and King County Court in general are anti-Christian and this illegal stance even the Supreme Court has rebuked.
The Supreme Court has told us in no uncertain terms that a prosecutor’s duty is to do justice, not merely to obtain a conviction. It has also laid down some specific rules about how prosecutors, and the people who work for them, must behave — Judge Alex Kozinski, U.S. Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit
The actions of those involved with this hate crime, both in and out of the court system, are so outrageous as to violate every basic tenet of the purpose of law.
Washington State is known for it’s witch-hunts. Athena Dean Holtz, and gang were fully aware of this and the King County Court system embraced them so fully that the stupidest statements make the stupid statements appear smart.
Prosecutor Jason Simmons even objected to Sound Doctrine Church having, yes, having an abuse prevention program of the highest degree in place. Naturally the false accusers couldn’t remember signing the agreement.
To point out that the State of Washington facilitated a hate crime is an under-statement of the 1st degree. Kinda like being absurd enough to declare that all through medical college Dr. Philip Welch never examined a penis or that an accuser cannot come in for a deposition because no adult can be found. This is the kind of nonsense the jury bought into.
Note: Compare the statement by Prosecutor Jason Simmons during the trial vs the snake oil applied before the appeals court. Below you see how the jury was worked up into a lynch-mob and the appeals court was slicked up to support King County Prosecutors no matter the evidence. By the way, where I come from this is called lying. Which is not only a crime, but far worse, a sin.
who in roughly 30 years of post-residency practice has never physically examined a penis…
– Prosecutor Jason Simmons During the Trial
area of female reproductive anatomy, as opposed to male genitalia
– Prosecutor David Seaver to Appeals Court
(Tuesday, July 16, 2013, Enumclaw.com)—
Prosecutor Jason Simmons responds to Malcolm Fraser’s Appeal to Arrest Judgment.
In Simmons legal brief to the judge, Prosecutor Simmons makes the absurd suggestion that a Doctor, in 30 years of practice, has “never physically examined” one single penis.
Satterberg Prosecutors: Mark Larson, Lisa Johnson, Rich Anderson, Jason Simmons agreed “So what.” to evidence from the start and in open court.
To say that the Malcolm Fraser trial was loaded with such non-sense statements would be an understatement of the year.
This is the kind of junk the jurors were preached to by Prosecutor Simmons for 20 days until finally in bigotry sending an innocent man to jail.
Prosecutor Jason Simmons’ response to defense’s Motion to Arrest Judgment.
Prosecutor Simmons rebuttal shows his normal, convoluted pattern of throwing out sentences and words with no logical connection just to win a trial. He wrote in a legal document to a judge that a Dr. had “never” seen one single penis. This lazy accusation method is by design as it allows the listener to fill in emotions and tack on a slight-of-word false justification. To us normal, lowly honest folks it is called a lie by exaggeration.
That Prosecutor Simmons can get by with twisting the Constitution and announcing that the State must be given a fair trial is staggering to law abiding citizens. There are simply too many weak-willed, logical pot-holes in Prosecutor Simmons’ rebuttal, but let us focus in on— are you ready? —A Doctor who has never examined a penis.
Here we see classic Simmons using reasonable words to promote the most unfounded statements of fact. Read it yourself and laugh.
“Dr. Welch, an OBGYN who in roughly 30 years of post-residency practice has never physically examined a penis…”
Never, ever examined a penis?
Not one time did the good Dr. all through residency examine a penis?
Were it not for the fact that Prosecutor Simmons is knowingly sending an innocent man to prison for life, I would have fallen out of my chair laughing. I apologize for the title-but my fingers would not stop typing it. I plead the insanity defense as Prosecutor Simmons is driving me crazy with his crazy accusations.
Now you know why any evidence, any fact is not only irrelevant to Prosecutor Simmons but is used as a springboard to make any absurd charge.
Either Prosecutor Simmons is in over his head, or the Prosecutor’s Office is corrupt and out of control. Or both are possible I suppose. I hope Prosecutor Satterburg stops playing in his rock band long enough to clean up the mess. I know I am available to help as soon as the Enumclaw Police have ran me out of town.
No wonder Prosecutor Simmons enjoyed the use of Athena Dean and Detective McCall! They lie alike. But trusting Prosecutors like this with the truth is the stupidest thing Washington State can do. The truth is that any first year medical student sees plenty of penises and can diagnose this condition.
Now you know why expert witnesses refuse to help defendants. The Prosecutors Office treats them with such contempt that it blocks the truth—which is Prosecutor’s goals around the country. Mr. Fraser was fortunate to have the doctor be willing to testify to the truth that while the condition permits sex with a willing partner it would completely stop what the False Accuser suggested.9